By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
Mazty on 10 May 2010
Edit Thread
Kenryoku_Maxis said:
Mazty said:

You clearly aren't thinking.

Take a game like Golden Eye. In what way is it better than Red Faction II? In what way is RF II better than Resistance 2. I don't hate old games, just my expectations have gone up with every generation, as they should do, otherwise what the hell is the point in dishing out for a new console if it's offering exactly the same as it's predecesor? Muramasa is inferior because it's not a challenge, or not nearly as much a challenge as other, more modern offerings.

I never said God of War 3 is the pinnacle of gaming, I just said it offers a more "hardcore" experience to those who may find Muramsa a brreeze and therefore, not entertaining defeating the point of the game - to keep you entertained.

All the people in the thread haven't had a valid reason as to why they dislike God of War in comparison to Muramasa. I found the guy who said he found the cell shaded game with 20 ft Samurai more mature than God of War very ironic.

Veiled insults, baiting comments and selective listening.  And I'm not thinking?  More like you're purposefully not listening.  Let me put it in terms you can understand.  You have your own opinions, but they aren't shared by everyone else.  And no matter how much you deflect the main point and just force your opinion, it still doesn't change other peoples views or make you right.

And just to clarify, if the primariy reason for liking a game isn't because its fun, then ultimately what else is there?  I think you need to sort out why you play games, and stop trying to cretique other peoples reasons for liking one game over another.  Its pretty sad when someone starts judging someone for not being 'hardcore' enough for finding more entertainment in one game over another.

Congratualtions on a troll post. You entirely ignored what I said and just criticised my view while avoiding all specifics.

When did I say the point of a game wasn't to provide fun? Fact is some do it better than others, and once your expectations of said fun have been raised, how can you go back? Like put someone on GT 4, then give them GT1 - which are they going to enjoy more? A hardcore gamer is going to want a challenge, and a basic 2D game which pits you against 4 enemies at a time, maybe 6, isn't going to provide the same challenge as one which puts you against 20 on a 3D axis is it?

The fact you don't want to analysis someone's opinion is worrying - pro tip for the future, don't do an analytical subject.