Kenryoku_Maxis said:
Why does one game have to be 'better' than another? Muramasa can still be just as good of a game as God of War 3. I'm sure some people like it more than God of War 3. There's no stone slab out there that says God of War 3 is better than all the Wii action games out there. And if all there is to support that claim is things like 'presentation' and 'graphics', it only supports that point further. One systems AAA game doesn't make another systems game automatically inferior. Its just like all those people trying to say FFXIII is automatically the end all of JRPGs this gen just because its the most hyped and seemingly the most 'AAA'. Its not. Long story short, Muramasa is still one of the best gamesa on the Wii and a fantastic game. And one he might enjoy if he played it. |
Yeah I don't get this idea that a game has to be the best among it's genre in order to be worth playing.
Also comparing Muramasa to God of War III is like apples and oranges. They are two very different beasts. And it's completely unfair when those partial to Sony casually brush off Muramasa as some crappy 2D version of God of War. I bet if Vanillaware released Muramasa on PS3 just like they released Odin Sphere on PS2, the Sony sympathizers would have a very different tune.
I found Muramasa to be quite enjoyable personally. It is flashy, offers more depth than I thought would be possible for a Wiimote + Nunchuk game (you can play with a Gamecube or Classic Controller if you want though. But aside from the analog stick giving me some trouble during boss fights, the WM + Nunchuk ain't bad. I haven't felt a need to get out my CC Pro yet playing on Shura difficulty). And the game offers a good challenge without being punishing on the player or comprising the game's accessibility. I'm about 13 or so hours in. Beat Momohime's route (apparently there are extra endings but haven't had those yet) and I'm almost halfway through Kisuke's playthrough. I really enjoyed Muramasa thus far. One of the numerous reasons I got a Wii.







