Final-Fan said:
Now here's where I have to call bullshit. Earlier you gave examples of games that were more than worth the money: "I spent $80 for D2 LoD, and I spent hundreds of hours on it, many many hundreds. $70 for Starcraft and Warcraft 2 and 3 and I spent hundreds of hours out of them. UT2004 set me back only $50.Don't even get me started on the value of Civ 4. FInally, while I have spent around $750 on WoW, I have 250 days of /played. That's 6,000 hours. |
I will admit, D2 LoD, I spent playing on Bnet. However SC I spent far far longer playing on LAN than I did on Bnet, and Warcraft 3 was 50/50 solely because I wasn't geographically close to the people I played with . Remove LAN from SC2, and those hundreds of hours can be cut drastically, making it not worth it. That is even more true considering I now have a laptop to carry around for SC2 and not a desktop, making LAN even more viable than before.
I'd be disappointed because that means consumers decided to get a shaft up their ass instead of sticking a shaft up a developer's ass to put them in their place.
Tag(thx fkusumot) - "Yet again I completely fail to see your point..."
HD vs Wii, PC vs HD: http://www.vgchartz.com/forum/thread.php?id=93374
Why Regenerating Health is a crap game mechanic: http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=3986420
gamrReview's broken review scores: http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=4170835








