By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
pizzahut451 on 08 May 2010
Edit Thread
dunno001 said:
pizzahut451 said:
SciFiBoy said:
pizzahut451 said:
SciFiBoy said:

thanks for missing the point I was making.

of course they are different things, BUT they are both an example of a majourity of people oppressing a minority of people.

slavery was also a tradition, people used the same kind of justification as you are to defend it.

Homophobia is just another form of bigotry, plain and simple.

so not being able to get married and adopt is the same as someone treating you as slave???? Im sure it was hard for gays not to get married and adopt. Its not like they were slaves or something (*sarcasam*)

so youre basically just going to keep trolling and ignoring my points (and other peoples points for that matter) then?

so youre basically just going to keep insulting and ignoring my poitns then?

No, he's right. You're the one ignoring points brought up, for ones that you feel you can't (or rather, know you can't) refute. And for the ones you think you can argue, you keep using the same unproven theories and beliefs, never offering any further evidence of why they should be other than you think so, or a "majority" of people think so. (Actual majority parts even, are unproven, rather, you use speculation for them.) I've stopped using evidence with you, since it's futile; you pick out what you want to talk about, based on your 2 talking lines, and discard the rest.

Come back to this thread with provable fact, not belief and speculation, and then maybe we can continue to have an actual discussion. Until then, there's really nothing to talk about.

I know i said im not gonna argue with you anymore but you're getting so annoying its making my brain explode.

 

He said ''they are both an example of majority of people oppressing a minority of people''.

Than i said ''yes, but oppressiong minority of people as in not being able to get married and making them slaves is totally diffrent and thats why his example fails. If gays were treated like slaves or something similiar to that, his example would be vaild.