Have the Wii's graphic limits caused it to have more "evergreen" titles?

[Kenryoku_Maxis]

mortono said:

NightDragon83 said:
It's very simple really... Wii and DS are targeted primarily at the "casual audience"... the casual audience doesn't troll video game websites on a daily basis or argue about graphics and which system is better... they simply buy what everyone else buys, which is why the same titles in the Wii's library are at the top of the heap, week after week and year after year.

This is the same reason why movies like the latest Twilight or Harry Potter films, and other hits like "The Dark Knight", and "Avatar" have such long legs at the box office.. because after all of the fanboys and movie geeks see it opening weekend, all of the casuals follow suit due to word of mouth and wanting to be a part of the latest fad or trend. Same concept with the Wii, and to a lesser extent the DS.

The "casual" audience is really what we should call the "mainstream" audience. I hate the word "casual" because it makes these people sound stupid and gullible as if they only really buy games like lemmings falling off a cliff. It's far from the truth. These are really the most cautious customers that are less influenced by hype and more influenced by actual playing time and recommendations from friends and family.

Indeed.  The term casual itself was only created by the quote 'hardcore' reviewers and internet forum hoppers as stated above in order to distinguish the other side from the 'hardcore' gamer.  Its just like those who call anything that is 'family oriented' or not focused solely on the adult audience as being 'kiddy'.  Just because something is popular and sells well to people beyond 14-26 year old males, doesn't make it 'casual'.  You certainly wouldn't call a Pixar movie casual.  Or even better, an iphone.

As such, many Wii and DS games get labeled with that kiddy/casual rating.  But its mostly just coming from that same 'hardcore' camp as negative propaganda for anything that isn't solely targeting them.