SeriousWB said:
I'm sorry but that sounds wrong to me. Such movements are based on possible effects on the world. There is a stark difference between an anti-war stance because war causes casualities in 'real-life' as opposed to a religious belief in fear of a 'supposed' damnation. Such movements are certainly not "basically secular religions". I agree with HappySqurriels comment on this statement though. |
I was speaking a bit loosely. There is an immense amount of dogmatism in such groups, and I think it's probably most noticeable among the green movement. One can be a rational environmentalist, certainly, but it requires basing one's conclusions on the evidence and not manipulating the evidence to fit one's conclusions. I've seen too many greens display as much zealotry and intolerance as any Islamic extremist when confronted by a skeptic.
People who are vehemently anti-religious have a tendency to make politics their religion.







