If you have any form of decency , this will be disturbing for you (NSFW)

[Final-Fan]

Slimebeast said:

KingFate said:

Slimebeast said:

Final-Fan said:
--1. I think this sort of thing could happen in the US, although it's probably harder here to get a random stray dog for the victim.
--2. KFJM was just saying that to show us that even he, someone who HATES dogs, was disgusted by how cruelly this dog was being treated, as an additional warning of how bad the video was.
--3. I don't think it's really appropriate to use this video to talk about immigration and liberals being soft on crime.

--1. Rarely. U think the only reason is because the laws are different and that there are less stray dogs in the US? U dont acknowledge any differences between cultures and their view on animals and the value of animals?
--2. I got that part, I'm not stupid. But you don't get it. If I would post a video with someone of [insert race or ethnic group here] getting beaten up, and I'd say "I hate [insert race here] with every fiber of my being ...  but this made me shed a tear" right after the video, do you think that would be appropriate?
--3. Of course you don't.

--1. Slimebeast, look up Micheal Vick, animal abuse is a HUGE problem in the US. It's done by people of every color, every race, every religion.
--2. What JKFM was trying to say is, he may hate dogs, but he still understands life has value and anything suffering is horrific. So I find his comment appropriate.
--3. Immigration is derailing this thread, it has nothing to do with animal cruelty.

--1. Yes it's a huge problem, but your dodging the question.
--2. You don't get it. I got that part already. But if it was a woman getting beaten up, could he have used the word "hate"? Do you think that would have been appropriate?
--3. I wasnt going into that any further.

--1.  No, that's not the only reason.  But you made it sound like that sort of thing was commonplace in that culture, while it wouldn't happen in the superior American culture -- or so it seemed to me.  And both parts of that would be inaccurate IMO to say the least. 
--2.  The difference, I think, is simply that if it had been someone beating up a woman or a black (or a Mexican!) then his preface would be seen as inappropriate because of his hatred for them -- not because of the preface. 
--3.  Even if you weren't going any further, this is not an appropriate soapbox.  It's inflammatory and you know it.