scottie said:
But in the Mac/Pc debate there are two variables - you make a lot more money from kacing PC's than you do macs, because more people use them. So thanks for admitting my comparison is perfect :)
And this is why I said that you would be better off reading my first post properly
"2) Whatever the reason, Mac is more secure. This guy, as a computer hacker, defines security purely in terms of the strength of the code. I would define security in terms of how much threat viruses pose to your system. A bad castle in the bronze age is more secure than a good castle in modern times. However, it's not a hugely important point, because neither definition is inherently right, and really it comes down to semantics." |
which castle would you rather be in during an attack lol the highly secure one or the one with one old half bind sentry and an unlocked door. yes you are far less likely to be attacked but if you are you have less protection, I know mac users that use no security software at all because they think like you do but they are far more likely to have a keylogger steal their credit card info than someone that has a windows machine with a firewall and antivirus/antispyware software who checks to make sure that the sites they enter that data into is secure etc. My point is there are mac viruses and keyloggers etc for the mac infact they are on the rise but as people think they don't have to worry about it because they have a mac they are far less secure.
@TheVoxelman on twitter







