By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
aragod said:
Mazty said:


Clearly you've never played Sum Com. SC2 looks far more cartoony then Sup Com and is hardly pushing any graphical boundaries:

http://www.2404.org/downloads/Supreme%20Commander:%20Forged%20Alliance/11842168782.jpg
http://www.2404.org/downloads/Supreme%20Commander:%20Forged%20Alliance/11842168826.jpg

No, both games are base building RTS' with a tech tree etc. This isn't like comparing Sup Com to Dawn of War II.

Sorry, Starcraft is far better game in every aspect than Supreme Commander. SupCom2 is worse than the first SupCom, the community backlashed at the developer short after release, sitting on meta of 77 with user rating 61 and community quickly dying off. On the other hand, Starcraft II while still in beta has already running tournaments, have joined the e-sports community with great honors and has more people playing beta than other RTS games from the last decade. And that beta is still closed. There is no point in arguing here, SCII while not even released is the better, prettier, more balanced and more entertaining game. It's community will be the largest upon it's release, while other games will die off. Like it happend with SC1. Deal with it.

 

Sup Com 2 is a load of ass, hence why I'm talking about the first....Love how you state how it's inferior to SC2. Oh wait, you haven't at all...

Actually look in the SC2 beta forums. Many of the pro players are complaining about a lot of the units having no role to play & how it's horribly unbalanced e.g. Zerg sucking.
Nice to see your entire argument is as chilish as it gets. "It's good because I say so and other people say so". Well it's sad to see that the mindless masses still exist. Until you can state why it's such a good game other than sheer nostalgia, oh dear.