By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
Mazty on 23 April 2010
Edit Thread
aragod said:
Mazty said:
aragod said:
Mazty said:
Worse graphics & less tactics then Supreme Commander, so no, I'm not going to replace an RTS with one which is lacking in the T department.

Supreme Commander looks like shit (that's not a compliment fyi) and less tactic in the ever evolving 10 year and ongoing RTS god with largest fanbase ever (that's a starcraft fyi)? Most of the top SC players already moved onto SC2 beta...

http://img.hexus.net/v2/gaming/screenshots_pc/supreme/supreme2_large.jpg

http://www.heyheyandyk.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/01/starcraft2_06.jpg

 

Uhuh, and how does Supreme Commader look worse than Starcrft 2, something which looks like it's cell shaded? Not to mention, how's the panning of the camera to the floor working out? Oh it isn't...

Oh yeah because a large fanbase means the game must be good...? No, no it doesn't.

I've played both SC2 Beta and Supreme COmmander. Please tell me what SC2 does better than Sup Com as it seems you've neve rplayed the latter game.

Great job, you've managed to find some alpha screen from two years ago Blizzcon.

http://eu.media.blizzard.com/starcraft2/images/screenshots/ss106-hires.jpg

http://eu.media.blizzard.com/starcraft2/images/screenshots/ss105-hires.jpg

If you've played SC2 Beta, you would know that SupCom looks nothing, nothing like it. Even CC4 looks better than SupCom.

I'm not going into silly argumentation about what does SC better than Sup Com, both games are build on different premise.


Clearly you've never played Sum Com. SC2 looks far more cartoony then Sup Com and is hardly pushing any graphical boundaries:

http://www.2404.org/downloads/Supreme%20Commander:%20Forged%20Alliance/11842168782.jpg
http://www.2404.org/downloads/Supreme%20Commander:%20Forged%20Alliance/11842168826.jpg

No, both games are base building RTS' with a tech tree etc. This isn't like comparing Sup Com to Dawn of War II.