| Kasz216 said: , 1) I also disagree. However I think your level of outrage is far out of place. 2) Agreed. 3) Sure it does. They are trained proffesonals. There was no risk of them actually beating him to death. (outside of malice.) You argued that it doesn't take a trained person to kill soemone with a blow... which is true... however if you are a trained person you can make sure you won't kill someone with a blow. |
1) Fair enough. I don't really agree, but you're free to think so IMO.
3) There's always a risk in such things IMO - you could say that the risk in this case is minute, but it's there by external/unknown factors alone - hell, they didn't know that the kid had a fatal condition in the first place.
Thing is - my biggest problem isn't really that they could have killed him, the problem was that they were beating him in the first place. But that's a different discussion entirely.
Warning: The preceding message may or may not have included sarcasm, cynicism, irony, full stops, commas, slashes, words, letters, sentences, lines, quotes, flaeed gramar, cryptic metaphors or other means of annoying communication. Viewer discretion is/was strongly advised.
