| Kasz216 said: , 1) It doesn't really change the point 2) The core issue isn't the same... the scale makes it not so. One involves the death. The other involves bruises. 3) No, but being a county sheriff, you are in fact trained and know what kind of attack can and would hurt somebody.... these were in fact... trained proffesionals... and they actually had the nurse there to diagnose any problems. That's why they actually did cause the ambulence when significant problems arose. |
1) Doesn't still make it acceptable to use corporal punishment on minors IMO, regardless of how controlled or well-intentioned it is. I do understand why they did what they did, I just disagree with it.
2) Fine, I'll drop this.
3) I never believed they actually tried to cause any long lasting damage to the kid. Doesn't really change anything IMO.
Warning: The preceding message may or may not have included sarcasm, cynicism, irony, full stops, commas, slashes, words, letters, sentences, lines, quotes, flaeed gramar, cryptic metaphors or other means of annoying communication. Viewer discretion is/was strongly advised.
