kowenicki said:
highwaystar101 said:
kowenicki said:
CrazyHorse said:
Yeah watching it now. I was a little underwhelmed by the manifesto launches so hopefully tonight will be a little more interesting.
On the first topic, immigration, I'm giving the victory to Nick Clegg.
|
Brown: Immigration is fine basically. Doesnt wanty a cap, current rules are beginning to work. bull.
Cameron: Immigration is too high (no shit). Points system and limits, new countries into EU - transitional limits. seems ok. Wants limits and caps. Border Police force (hallelujah)
Clegg: Chaos at the moment, monitor exit controls..?! Immigrants can only go to regions where they can be accomodated.. (terrible idea and untterly unworkable!!!). There is good immigraton and bad immigration... we need immigrant skills and therefore no caps and carry on.
How the hell can you have regional immigration... allowed in sent to a region... what is to stop them moving... its all one country?
|
He said regional employment, not regional living didn't he? I think regional employment is a feasible idea. |
Are the lib dems the kind of party that would deport peop,e that tried to migrate around the country? is the UK justice system the kind of system that will deport in this instance? No. wouldnt work.
|
My browsers playing up, booo.
Anyway, no regional living wouldn't work. However I think regional employment would. The burden on migrating around the country to live is solely on the immigrant, if they want to do it they will, it will be hard to stop.
With regional employment the law affects the employer as well. Each immigrant has a card that says the region where they are allowed to work (hopefully with a job to go to). If the employer employs someone who is working out of their region then they get punished as well as they immigrant. It would be far easier to monitor and punish.
I think the punishment in regional employment wouldn't solely be on the immigrant.
