By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
CGI-Quality said:
Legend11 said:
CGI-Quality said:
Legend11 said:
CGI-Quality said:
Again, will someone show me where it was proven to be "smoke & mirrors"?


You posted a story from a website almost nobody has ever heard about yet you're asking about something that was discussed on many major websites?

With that, you have nothing concrete to refute it either. Tell me what that has to do with Milo being "smoke & mirrors" or not?


Well then if you don't believe it's "smoke & mirrors" why did you post a story basically stating that?  In fact the story goes on to call it a fiasco (an opinion since it can be easily argued that the demo achieved its goal of getting people talking about Natal) yet you post afterwards that the demo impressed you,  Do you always post stories that go completely against everything you believe?  Why promote something that you feel is false which is exactly what you did by posting this story?

Actaully the article is saying it was declared by some to be all smoke & mirrors while to many others, it was a technical achievment. What don't you get?

Microsoft is setting the record straight, that the demo was real and will be shown to work. I posted this to let people know that Micorosoft reassures everyone that Milo is 'the next step".

Seems you missed the purpose of the article, entirely.

Woe. Peeps. Poor CGI.

Dont get on his back. What happened to not guilty until proven?

M$ said it was a realtime demo. Now. It's possible the tech shown was simpler than what we thought. Maybe a set number of modes for the demo. Maybe the AI could think for itself within a set perameter. But CGI simply said there is no proof against it other than fanboy nonsense.

Yes it does seem to good to be true. Can they actually pull the level of freedom off that they are portraying? Who knows, but if Molyneux is making Milo then we will all know within 12 months.