Majin-Tenshinhan said:
routsounmanman said:
Majin-Tenshinhan said:
routsounmanman said:
Majin-Tenshinhan said:
routsounmanman said:
What was wrong with D/P/Pt? O_O |
Just wasn't very fun.
Also, in my opinion, hardly any Gen 3 or 4 Pokémon are interesting in the slightest. They're a massive step down from Gen 1 and 2.
|
Gen 1 & 2 were plain broken; gen 3 and 4 took the games' core and made it much more interesting and compelling. STAB, Physical/Special Split, Abilities and many more. About the 'mons themselves, I think you let nostalgia cloud your judgement a bit. Seriously. Many gen 1 & 2 Pokemon are trash; Jynx? Exeggutor? Unknown? Parasect? Hypno? Foretress?
The only gen's Pokemon I didn't care for were 4th ones. Too many legendaries (crappy ones, too) and too many old evolutions. Don't get me started on Pokemon like Burmy :-/
|
People like to pull the nostalgia card, but no. To start off, I didn't say every Pokémon from Gen 1 and 2 was fantastic so your argument is flawed right off the bat. If you wanted to contradict me you should've listed Pokémon from gen 3 and 4 that were interesting, because that would actually stand against something I said.
Moving on, the only Pokémon I have an issue with from your examples is Jynx, and possibly, maybe, Exeggutor.
|
OK how about a large portion of Gen 4's Pokemon were evolutions from the 2nd gen? Going by this, how can Gen 2 Pokemon be interesting while Gen 4 cannot? Your argument is flawed as well...
|
... How similar are Magmar and Magmortar, really? Seriously.
|
We ARE looking at the same Pokemon, right? Does Magmar seem more interesting to you than Magmortar?
How about this?
I can give you this crap, though:
