| mesoteto said: @stof--except they never said that, they never even really researched into Nin just made it seem like they were a bad comapny---to me thats a lie by omission |
Actually they gave a breakdown of the info. There were numerous categories in which Nintendo failed for not providing information. But they also failed other categories for not having policies on PVC reduction, not having policies for recycling old consoles and not mentioning manufacturer responsibility in any of their missionstatements or literature.
So Nintendo provided no information to them and what they were able to find on their own was pretty dysmal. So with no reason to think that Nintendo has done a single thing to curb their environmental impact, why would thay earn anything higher than a 0?
And that said, Greenpeace did still mention in that release that the Wii consumes less power than the ps3 and 360.
This isn't Jack Thompson blaming video games for other phenomena, it's an environmental group pointing out the environmental impact of console manufacturers. I still fail to see why anyone is angry about this.
I'm a mod, come to me if there's mod'n to do.
Chrizum is the best thing to happen to the internet, Period.
Serves me right for challenging his sales predictions!
Bet with dsisister44: Red Steel 2 will sell 1 million within it's first 365 days of sales.
