Rpruett said:
The truth lies somewhere in the middle. 86 on the PS3 / 90 on the 360. I could say Bayonetta averages out at an 88 overall. Either way, 3 points is 3 points. God of War 3 has also sold quite a bit more on quite a smaller gamer base in a much shorter amount of time. Consumers have spoken of their opinion of quality / enjoyment of the two games. Bayonetta is a niche game to me. A game that die hard fans of it will swear by it but more people will avoid it than go out of their way for it. Gameplay is almost entirely a personal preference thing. For example, I hate Ninja Gaiden-esque game play. I don't enjoy Ninja Gaiden's simply because of their gameplay. So while it's great that you enjoy Bayonetta more, you're in the minority. |
Averaging the scores is a terrible thing to do. The PS3 version being a bad port doesn't take anything away from the XBox360 version.
As for the debate, well, I think they are pretty different styles of hack and slash. In the end, people will prefer different styles. Now if you compare a game like Dante's Inferno and God of War 3, which are very similar in gameplay style, then I could see someone trying to make an objective argument for which game is better.
I think Rainbow 6: Ravenshield is better than Killzone 2. But that's because I prefer the style of gameplay in R6: Ravenshield over the style of gameplay in Killzone 2. Yes, both games are first person shooters, but there's more than enough variety within that genre to have games co-exist without having to compare them.
By the way, were there all these hack and slash comparisons between God of War 1/2 and Devil May Cry 1/2/3? Why is everyone so worked up about Bayonetta vs God of War 3?