Why the graphics in Crystal Bearers is more impressive than many think.

[LordTheNightKnight]

Zucas said:

Carl2291 said:
So it's better looking than a 4 year old game on the weakest last-gen platform?

Awesome!

What I was thinking.  Don't think we should give too much credit to a developer who is having issues making a game look better than a 4 yr old title using a system that is 3x more powerful.

Personally, I thought the graphics got the job done Crystal Bearers, but like the game as a whole, with just some more attention to detail and possibly more time (funny considering it took so long) the game could have been a wondeful title.  I enjoyed it but was not a great game by my standards nor a good looking one.  When games like Twilight Princess (launch title/GC port) and Galaxy (2007) exist on the system, we shouldn't be taking a step backwards. 

Again, take that up with those who claim the graphics aren't as impressive.

Also, the development time wasn't that long. I thought it was long as well, but I found out the announcement of the game was a couple years before they even knew what kind of game they were making.