Wow that's... that's just terrible... I think he may have gotten Natal mixed up with the PS Eye itself, or that he just doesn't understand how the 3D camera tech works cause he's just blatantly wrong.
The idea of 3D camera tech is that it basically maps out everything it sees in 3D and that includes judging on the X, Y, and Z planes. Thats the big difference between PS Eye and Natal, which is the whole "innovation", PS Eye judges depth by seeing an object get bigger or smaller, but if you had a balloon deflate in front of it, it would assume the balloon is actually going away from the camera since the object is getting smaller, Natal would actually see the balloon deflate.
Not that the end result of the two cameras is different, the 3D tech makes it more accurate for motions and details with the motions, but outside of that I don't see how many games could benefit from the tech.
If you wanted to show "proof" as to why Move is better than Natal, that video isn't it, you could post one of the many videos of Natal actually glitching up at E3 and show it side by side with some actual games being played or that tech demo MakingMusic shows everyone to have a much better argument, and a much better thread.
MaxwellGT2000 - "Does the amount of times you beat it count towards how hardcore you are?"
Wii Friend Code - 5882 9717 7391 0918 (PM me if you add me), PSN - MaxwellGT2000, XBL - BlkKniteCecil, MaxwellGT2000
