aragod said:
I wasn't comparing Q3 to UT2004, but noob friendly CS to UT. Anyway I just went through my old WCG videos and comparing speed of Q3 + 4 vs UT2004, UT does look like a snail compared to Quake. So so so slow. Both UT and Quake are beeing played at LANs, but not a big official progaming events. |
Thought you were talking Quake, sorry. But of course CS will be still in media and places, because it's noob friendly more people can just play it and get less people get discouraged to just drop the game. Noob games are just more popular, as shown by any shooter in the past 6 years.
Quake is only faster for moving through the level because of the hopping. However in actual battle, as you know, hopping is a sure way to get you killed unless you are running. Meanwhile UT is much much faster than Quake when it comes to a shootout, but much slower in navigating a level. Since the navigation of a level really doesn't matter since levels are buiolt around the speed of navigation, UT wins. It's much harder to nail a person in UT than it is in the slow Quake.
Tag(thx fkusumot) - "Yet again I completely fail to see your point..."
HD vs Wii, PC vs HD: http://www.vgchartz.com/forum/thread.php?id=93374
Why Regenerating Health is a crap game mechanic: http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=3986420
gamrReview's broken review scores: http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=4170835








