By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
vlad321 said:
aragod said:
vlad321 said:
aragod said:
vlad321 said:
 

Yes see, even in the random pubs of CS I can't pull off shit like that. I can't just pick up the rocket launcher or flak cannon and end up near the top right off the bat the way you can do in CS.

Also I am sorry but UT is the definitive skill yardstick, specifically UT2004 where everything is retardedly fast. Q3 was close second, and the CS a far far third. And all of those 3 are a speck in the horizon compared to shooters post-Xbox.

I'm not going to argue why Q3 > UT, or why CS > UT. I don't need to, popularity of these games and onoing progaming community shown the "finger" to Unreal Tournament years ago. It might be news for you, but in Q3 you could set up the speed of the game to pretty much anything you wanted. Even Painkiller was better than UT and it was a poor spinoff.

CS only remains because it's noob friendly. Just like any modern game. However saying that Q3 somehow exists more than UT is just laughable. The community around UT has created so much more than the community for Q that is clearly shows support for UT. UT basically far outpaces Q in absolutely anything. I also know you can set the speed to anything, you can do so in UT as well, but I am talking about the default speed.

Yeah what ever... You are so delusional that trying to argue with you is complete waste of time. In the end, noob friendly game is alive and kicking after 10 years and is the only FPS to hold interest of both progamers and media, becoming a unchallanged legend of it's genre, while UT2004 was in the spotlight only in the year of it's release, forgoten one year later with whitdrawal from all major progaming events.

You seem to be delusional. First of all Quake has not been mentioned in the media for many many years while UT2004 still makes mentiones. Second, there are far more modders for UT than there are for Quake with more content being released as well. The only reason Quake got a small boost was because of Quake Live last year, and that's it. UT2004 tournaments are still upheld in LAN parties, not Quake 3. SO i don't know which rock you have been living under, but you need to stop deluding yourself.

I wasn't comparing Q3 to UT2004, but noob friendly CS to UT. Anyway I just went through my old WCG videos and comparing speed of Q3 + 4 vs UT2004, UT does look like a snail compared to Quake. So so so slow. Both UT and Quake are beeing played at LANs, but not a big official progaming events.



MY HYPE LIST: 1) Gran Turismo 5; 2) Civilization V; 3) Starcraft II; 4) The Last Guardian; 5) Metal Gear Solid: Rising