vaio said:
Why are you avoiding to prove your claims?
We have given you links and eamples to all your questions you had before this one now its your turn to provide us with links to all your claims. in case you forgot: dont avoid proving your claims and show us some links to support them. Show proof of 180ms lag. Allready failed at this and only proving that you talk out of your ass. Show me proof that hardcore gamers are not buying the wii, there are lots of proof otherwise just on this site and users here and by me posting. Show proof that most wii´s are collecting dust You are not getting of that easy we have provided you with answers and examples and just because you dont agree doesnt mean that they are not valid. So show some proof instead of whinning like a butthurt little kid. When you have done this we can continue the discussion. |
Wow you clearly have never played Resistance 2, Killzone 2 or many PC FPS if you think it has been done all before. Thanks for helping to back my claim that many wii owners are not real gamers.
I said "Gears of War made the cover-system shooter work", not that it invented it, so why did you say that?
No, film-like games have not been done on PC in the way Uncharted was done. Stop talking about games you have clearly never played.
PC media hubs did exist before console hubs BUT they were massive/needed a PC hooked to the TV which is far more awkward than using a console which both have wireless pads.
Bluray allows larger games and HD films, so yeah, that's doing something for entertainment and helping to progress gaming as multiple DVD's is not beneficial for devs and has already limited games (e.g. Rage).
Why seperate consoles and PC? Both play games and both have genres which are across all platforms. For what arbitrary reason are you seperating PCs from consoles?
You clearly have **** all idea about gaming as you claim all the games out on the 360 and PS3 have been done before which is blatant trash talk. It's clear you have very little knowledge of what the consoles offer and what games specifically offer in comparison to other games.
Why do I need to show you evidence about wii's collecting dust? My point was that if Nintendo made a new console which was simply a wii with better hardware it would not sell as no serious gamer would play on a wii, as it offers no benchmark games. It's like showing you a photo of the blue sky then you asking for proof.
You claim that wii games are intuitive, and therefore for hardcore gamers so please, which games are so intuative they are seen as benchmarks for their genre?
PS. It's nothing shy of hilarious I've been asking the same question for many pages and you've yet to actually give a straight reply.