By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
Final-Fan said:
I've come to realize that there are three at least remotely realistic possibilities in relation to the trangent thing:

1. There are two vote-restricted zombie roles (of 9 total players!).
2. There are two vote-restricted roles, but one is human.
3. There is one vote-restricted role, and dsister is lying.

In case 1:
A: I don't think it's likely at all.
B: If it is the case, then it's extremely likely that there were only 2 humans to start with, and one is dead so we can afford to risk a mislynch if we have a decent case against someone.

In case 2: I find dsister's role much, much more believable than trangent's.

In case 3: We lynch dsister obviously. (But I don't think we have much reason to believe case 3.)

Now, I was going to say that given these possibilities, we should go ahead and lynch trangent. But I also realized that TRANGENT HAS NO VOTE. Therefore, he's less of a threat than humans normally would be. Consequently, if we want to do some more human-hunting, that's not necessarily a bad idea ... but I'm keeping my vote on trangent, unless something really compelling pops up.

I don't consider dsister to be a vote-restricting role, though. I mean, he can't vote on the first day, sure, but as he moves closer to the town he gains the ability to vote and be night killed. 

Looking at it this way wouldn't it be more believable that there are two? I want discussion, dammit! 

@ WoW- fine. -_-

 

 



 Tag (Courtesy of Fkusumot) "If I'm posting in this thread then it's probally a spam thread."