miz1q2w3e said:
theARTIST0017 said:
miz1q2w3e said:
art looks fabulous but we need screens and videos to make judgement
if i've learned anything from the Epic Mickey incedent it's that never assume good art = good graphics |
thats funny. everyone disses Epic Mickey in my thread but look at my avatar and my signature. there's nothing wrong with Epic Mickey. If you guys sound like graphic whores right now. Epic Mickey is premature in development, hence, there's no media blowout on it. This game is being made by Mistwalker and you guys have doubts?! shameful.
|
the art in your avatar & sig is FABULOUS! the screens we saw of Epic Mickey were not, not bad from a technical graphics perspective but from the art style perspective. you do have a point however that the screens for EM were from very early in developement, that's why i would have rather not had any screens of the game until if looked more presentable.
i'm just saying that just cuz the "art" of the game looks a certain way doesn't always mean that the ingame look will resemble it, anyway this game's art looks cool so thant's at least a good sign :)
|
I suppose you're right. Epic Mickey is still high on my liist though. (Maybe they should have Super Mario Galaxy programmer's do the graphics for Epic Mickey, but then again it was rumored that Pixar was involved in development so hey who knows right) And I believe in Mistwalker to wow us in the graphics department. If Capcom can do it with Gamecube, then I don't see why Wii can't. (3rd Party wise i mean)
