TheRealMafoo said:
AT&T should not have to back up there claims. If AT&T wanted to just close there doors and walk away, they have that right. And what in the world do you think the government is going to do if AT&T proves they will fall under hardship? Give them money? Give me a break. What will happen, is the CEO will sit there, and get yelled at for 6 hours by congressmen. It's not an invitation, it's an order. I am sure the CEO of AT&T can't just say to congress "Thanks for the offer, but I am not interested." Besides, AT&T is a multi billion dollar successful company. Who do you think has a better accounting department? Them, or the federal government?Explaining how the expenditure of money effects profit to Congress, is like explaining how a computer works to a dog. They won't understand. |
No they shouldn't have that right, that would be socially irresponsible, and definitely worthy of investigation (why did an apparently healthy company close all of a sudden?) It would be irresponsible to the stockholders, at least, and worthy of SEC investigation.

Monster Hunter: pissing me off since 2010.







