Sony Explains why it passed on NATAL TECH

[pizzahut451]

Squilliam said:

C_Hollomon said:

Squilliam said:

thismeintiel said:

Seriously, as others have said, where's the trash talk at all in these statments?  The guy actually said he loved the 3-D camera tech, just that it didn't add much to what they were already doing and didn't allow them to do some things they were looking into.  So where's the trash talk?

Sony has no credibility to talk about competitor products. All they have ever done is trash talk the competition.

All companies trash talk each other.  Why you getting mad at Sony when they all do it? 

No they don't. You don't see Nintendo taking stabs at the userbase of the PS3 or say that PS3s are going into the closet. Sony has deservedly the worst reputation for talking smack about the competion but I wouldn't take offense if you disregarded anything Alan Greenburg said about Move because hes obviously biased and he too has a poor reputation as an individual. Sony has absolutely no credibility when talking about competitor products, none. They burnt it with all their stupid offhanded comments over the past couple of years.

nintendo said they would be ashamed to do what sony and MS are doing now,(on whole motion controlls thing) even though Natal and Move are not copies. They also said RPG gamers are depressed people who sit in dark rooms and play slow games.

 

^^just to name a few nintendo quotes