trangentspree said:
I'd like to see a more fuller explanation of this, if you would be so kind. |
Okay, Here's everything you listed for moi:
- j0 argues for Mario, saying he doesn't think he was refering to the game
- j0 seems to agree with Final-Fan
- j0 argues that Mario thought zombies are bad, unsure about alignment, edits in seeming unsure about that too
- j0 thinks Mario's posts make sense as jokes, but have been confusing
- j0 finds nordlead suspicious
- j0 debates about voting Mario or nordlead or no lynch
- j0 finally votes no lynch, but says would have chosen Nordlead over Mario
Now if you look at my post where I said similar things here
I already explained what I was thinking for not voting Mario yesterday, and now since you kindly put my posts in order it helps my point by comparing them, and what I see is exactly the same thing
---------------------------------------------
Now less about me, SuperAdriank needs to be talked to from what I noticed in the chart:
He said he didn't want to see Mario dead, he waits for Mario, but then goes to votes no lynch anyways. Later, he is the last one to vote for Mario. The thing that bothers me is that it seems that he could be someone throwing his fellow human under the bus to avoid suspicion, the whole day seemingly laying low and not adding much. And now he also votes for me, while I'm the center of suspicion.
Oh, and Truck, that post annoys me because it also seems lazy in your reason for voting "Oh, he's the only one I find suspicious now!" That's just like SuperAdriank -_-
Tag (Courtesy of Fkusumot) "If I'm posting in this thread then it's probally a spam thread."