By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
axt113 on 26 March 2010
Edit Thread
Cheebee said:
axt113 said:
^Mario 64 was only a success because people were expecting another Super Mario Game, instead they got star hunter Mario, and that's why 3D Mario has never been the success of Super Mario, which is why NSMB is a system seller and Galaxy is not.

Nintendo would be foolish to release another star hunter Mario, and they probably won't after Galaxy 2 flops hard (can't wait for that, will be a beautiful day, the end of 3D Star Hunter Mario)

Ah... I see. Silly me, posting thought-out comments and trying to analyze the factors involved in the individual games' successes. Didn't realize the kind of person I was dealing with, there. Seems like it turned out to be a forest-dwelling one. I apologize.

Calling me a troll isn't doing you any benefit, facts are facts, Star Hunter Mario has never been on the same level as Super Mario, even Mario 64 was more due to people hoping to see Super Mario 64, and getting Star Hunter Mario 1, if a real mario had been released on the N64, the result of that gen would have been totally different, Nintendo has already seen the monstrous success of NSMB on DS and Wii, and the failure of Galaxy 1, Galaxy 2, when it does even worse than Galaxy 1, will herald the end of the Star hunter Marios, why would Nintendo pursue a failing formula when a successful one is available



Rumors indicate that it is planning on following the first approach, sticking a new, motion-sensitive controller onto an existing console. Our perspective is that this is the worst of the three options.

-Clayton Christensen back in 2007 already knew Move would be a bad idea