By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
Reasonable said:
CommonMan said:
gekkokamen said:
the only thing these two games have in common is that both are sequel that are very much the same as the previous games. But in ME2 case, critics didn't seem to bring that up that much (that is the same) than they did with GoW3. Sales wise? GOW is a bigger franchise than ME, even though ME involves shooting that goes well with its target audience. Maybe they should include Multiplayer for ME3, that would do it....

I see by this and several other posts that we're back on the "360 is for shooters!" mantra again, why does this keep coming up? Is it just because Halo is so popular? This goes in waves and has been used to at any point indicate: the 360's library is terrible, the 360 users are shallow/young/n00bs/dull/sheep or that the games themselves are just copies of each other. It's a brilliant bit of spin that is a very versatile way to trash a bunch of things at once, but doesn't repeating it get a little old?

I know it's annoying but you'd be best to ignore it.  The 360 is just too linked to online / FPS huge sales for this argument to ever go away for certain posters so I wouldn't rise to it.

You know the 360 has a decent, diverse library and that's what matters in the end.

Agreed, I really don't know how you stay so darned. . . reasonable . . . all the time.