twesterm said:
It's not a question of why wouldn't I want it? it's a question of what do I want them to sacrifice? Would you rather they make a game that did alright at the sword controls and had multiplayer or would you rather they concentrate their effort on sword controls so they make a game with the best sword motion controls we've seen yet? Adding multiplayer isn't as simple as pressing a button and then done. It takes a lot of time, effort, and money. If they had put online multiplayer in there, the budget either would have grown far bigger than they could handle or other parts of the game would have suffered. It's not worth it. And if 50 Eurors for 10 hours doesn't cut it for you, then just don't buy it since it obviously isn't the game for you. Go play your Call of Duties and all other multiplayer games, again, not every game needs it. |
Since not that much is known about game development, many people think including features is a free or easy action.
A flashy-first game is awesome when it comes out. A great-first game is awesome forever.
Plus, just for the hell of it: Kelly Brook at the 2008 BAFTAs