badgenome on 25 March 2010
| Zucas said: Wow this is pathetic. Someone makes a post concerning some radicals that are obviously doing things that are damning upon not only their cause but Americans in general. It's something we all agree is dangerous to our freedom and to others' liberties and rights. Yet all people can do is say well the other side does it too so I question the poster's reasons for doing this. Seriously, that's the main issue right now affecting America. It's always one side versus another. Can't we just agree that their are morons and move on. We all know there are extremists on both sides. We know there are openly biased people to one side that talk in here. But for god's sake, it's not always about that. Don't be so paranoid all the time. Everyday I have to see so called libertarians who come off more as anarchists and it embarrasses me. But I don't go out and say, "well on the other side blah blah blah". There has got to be a point when even both sides, or many sides, can agree when something is bad or good without using it as a way to damn the other one. Founding fathers found a way to do it and so should you. |
Political violence is bad, mmmkay? But if you're horrified by violence from a bunch of knuckledragging hillbilly Nazis and not bothered in the least by the violence perpetrated by the enlightened ones with whom you clearly identify... that's pretty fishy. So, yeah, I think it's bleedingly clear what Manus' motive is.
The founding fathers had a much more rancorous discourse than you seem to think, Zucas. I know you fancy yourself something of an aspiring intellectual, so maybe you ought to crack a book before trying to cite any more history.
