Kasz216 said:
It's the "1/3rd" of there income was just given to them part... or at least I'd think so. He's argueing that when you give people money rather then make them earn it. They're less likely to become good with money and therefore more likely to stay poor rather then now where the US is fairly dynamic when it comes to upword (and downward) mobility. Those poor are now dependent on the government and the rich. Right now the US is actually quite good when it comes to upword mobility. |
I don't see how they have become more or less dependent on the government/rich. Their lives haven't changed in anyway. They are still doing the 10K a year job and there is nothing stopping them trying to earn more. All thats changed is that they have been given 5k for free.








