This thread is about the Phil Jones scandal and the validity of his research. Have deniers cherry picked information from the Phil Jones scandal to try and disprove global warming?
I just watched this (rather bias) video on Youtube, it starts off by talking about the Phil Jones scandal, a pivotal point for climate change denial. It dissects the BBC interview and attempts to show that deniers have been cherry picking evidence. It then discusses further examples and accuses deniers of wilful ignorance, faceless accusations and cherry picking.
I'm sure there is more to this than the video shows you (for example the accusation that climate deniers throw out as many faceless accusations as possible, which I know is often not the case. an unfair accusation), so I would like to hear some of your rebuttals to this video.
