By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
Mummelmann on 20 March 2010
Edit Thread
scottie said:
Mummelmann said:
scottie said:
Mummelmann said:
scottie said:

 

Are you accusing me of pro-Microsoft bias? Because frankly that is the funniest thing I have read in a long time. There was no reason to mention any of the 6 statements I noted in this article, the entire 1st, 2nd and 4th paragraphs in the article were completely off topic

 

No, I'm not accusing you of anything. I'm saying it appears you are seeing things that most others aren't in this article. I know you're not a HD gaming fan at all so no worries. I just don't see the bias and whining in the article at all, I've worked as a freelance journalist myself for a semi large newspaper (100-125.000 readers) and its all about the angle, the media is supposed to remain objective (which they many times aren't though, politics and videogames are excempt from this it sometimes it seems...). The angle here is just fine and couldn't have been much different if they were to run the story at all imo.

 

Yeah, it seems like I'm the only one seeing this. Moving on then..

 

It is a pretty bad error, considering the extent of the difference in the graphics between the games

Is the difference that big though? I have yet to see either version actually played out in front of me so I honestly have no clue. I kinda pictured differences like in Arkham Asylum or GRID to be honest.