leo-j said:
RolStoppable said:
nintendo_fanboy said:
misterd said:
In the tech business that may have been true, but Nintendo isn't pushing gear to the tech business. They're in the business of pushing consoles to the gaming market, which at the time in the US and EU (and is larely still today) males between the ages of 10-30 who saw a purple lunchpail as a reason to question one's sexual orientation. The perception then AND now remains that the GameCube was an underpowered system aimed at small children. Now, if you put the color aside, I agree with everything you said. The hardware and proprietary disc format was a reason many felt Nintendo would be better able to compete last generation. Unfortunately, the color choice and other bad marketing decisions (Mario Sunshine's "Clean is better than dirty" commercial; swapping out a "realistic" Zelda for Celda) kept the Cube's numbers low. And I suspect the difficulty in pirating software may have hurt their market as well, as many markets are big on bootlegs. While this may hurt the developers, it also encourages console sales, and that's going to boost the overall market size for them. |
There were some problems with the Cube, but you definitely can't say it was underpowered. It was only a little worse than the XBox which cost way more and it was actually better than the PS2, so you just can't call it underpowered. |
He was talking about the perception. He is right, people are stupid.  |
http://www.gamerankings.com/htmlpages2/932984.asp |
Wtf, a link to uncharted which has a 90% on Gamerankings?!... So THAT is your argument for saying PS2 is stronger than Gamecube?!... Tsss... Report!
