ZenfoldorVGI on 18 March 2010
| twesterm said: So he got to the end of the game and didn't beat it? So? Forgive my ignorance but in a 40+ hour game, is an extra two hours really going to change it from a 4/10 to a 10/10? It appears that he didn't like the story and I suffered through 40+ hours of a story I didn't like I doubt I would want to suffer through any more too. If he had played the game for 10 hours, maybe I could see the anger, but all the hubbub over him just not finishing the final level? |
He's a reviewer. He should be required to beat the games he reviews, it's his job. It doesn't matter how it theoretically would have affected his review, that is completely missing the point. He didn't beat the game, and if he didn't even beat it, I'd assume he probably went into the whole thing half-assedly with his mind made up before he started playing, but that's just me.
It's a job. It isn't "for fun" or a "hobby." When you have a job, you do it right, or your ass deserves to be fired.
I don't need your console war.
It feeds the rich while it buries the poor.
You're power hungry, spinnin' stories, and bein' graphics whores.
I don't need your console war.
NO NO, NO NO NO.
