Tretton: Move is not meant to replace current controllers

[M.U.G.E.N]

WilliamWatts said:

M.U.G.E.N said:

WilliamWatts said:

 

lol dude Relax. Did Jack do something personal to you or something?

And the tech on Move is way way better than Wii. It's just the way it is. I won't get into the software too much as it's better to wait until E3 or so to compare the line up, but even small games like table tennis, is more motion sensitive than what the Wii can offer (top spin etc even). I just want a solid Tennis game and I'm sold.

And i feel your interpreting the guy in a weird way here. The Move comes in fall yes? As of now there are 20 or so games ready to be released for those few months alone? I would say that's darn good. And what the guy says is good no? He says for the current ps3 owners like me, what we bought the PS3 for, those reasons will be met by SOny making the Move optional. THAT is a good thing. No matter what there are games that I rather not use Move for or forced to use it for.

Way better huh? Well does that make it way more fun? The only game where pure accuracy = fun is Gran Turismo, but I fail to see how Move is applicable for this game. The Wii has done pretty well for having computational power far lower than the PS3 so I doubt this is a contest pure technology is going to win if it hasn't already. If you just want a table tennis game you could get a table and a couple of rackets and a ping pong ball and you'll probably have more fun than with the PS3.

Most people didn't buy the PS3 until there were well over 200 titles available to it. So I don't see how 20 titles really ammounts for much in the scheme of things especially when Nintendo already has a mature library of titles. Maybe we'll have to wait until 2012 for the PS3 to catch up? What he says overall is terrible, if you read between the lines at what he is really saying. Hes not going to support Move the way Nintendo supports the Wiimote so you may as well face it and admit that the Move isn't going to Move much until next generation.

 

Now see I don't see such a meaning in between the lines as you in this case. For me, he is just reassuring the current gamers who do not like using motion tech in their games that Move won't be forced upon them. That they will have an option always.

As for the table tennis thing, it's just an example. Ofcourse there are many things if you do for real will be more fun :P What was that supposed to prove? It's like saying, oh why bother with Wii play when you can go do the same thing in real life. It's a game aimed at the casual audience mainly. People come to your house, and you either pull out a table tennis table or just plug in the Move? The more convenient and plausible option is obvious no?

As for the games, I have played the Wii, many times. Have I played Move yet? Nope :D So I won't say it's fun or not fun cuz frankly I have no idea as of now.

As for the number of titles. 20 means they won't stop everything they are doing just to give us Move games. It means they will give us the games the current group wants AS WELL AS games that use or impliment Move. Given the Sony line up this year, I for one am very happy so far. I just 'hope' those games are of good quality.