tuscaniman said:
1337 Gamer said:
tuscaniman said:
...for criticizing the price of ODST. Now before you bash this thread read my points and tell me you don't agree. For $60 you get:
1. Brand new campaign (on the somewhat short side 6-8 hrs but up to 10 hrs with exploration) Hated the Campaign
2. Firefight mode (all new multiplayer mode similar to Gears of War's Horde) Very laggy for online and also hated it
3. Every Map Pack released for Halo 3 (total of 24 multiplayer maps) Already owned 21 of the maps for halo 3 and the 3 more they added sucked.
4. Halo 3 multiplayer (for new 360 owners who haven't purchased Halo 3 yet this is huge..you can play Halo 3 online without buying it) Already Owned halo 3
4. Access to Halo:Reach Beta (arguably worth $60 itself) This i agree with you exceot not worth $60 maybe $10 max.
...and Activision owes us an explanation. For $15 you get:
1. 5 multiplayer maps (2 of which are on MW1)
So honestly ODST is not such a bad deal after seeing how Activision wants to rip us off on this new map pack.
|
I still think ODST was a rip off. Granted i didnt like the campaign or firefight mode but still in no way shape or form was it worth $60 for 3 shitty maps and the halo reach beta. I think Bungie owes me an Apology for releasing this poor excuse for a halo game.
|
You sure you're a halo fan? The campaign was better than Halo 3's in my opinion and the opinions of many of my friends. I thought it had an awesome dark and gritty feeling to it and bringing back the pistol from CE was clutch.
|
Dont question my halo fan status. I probably play halo ALOT more than you do and i could get some people on this forum to vouch for me. I and many other BIG halo fans i know absolutely hated the ODST campaign. And if you owned halo 3 and all the previous map packs and didnt like the campaign or firefight there was little left to like. Thus i feel that ODST was a poor package worth nowhere near $60.