selnor said:
aragod said:
selnor said:
aragod said:
selnor said:
Kenoid said:
still, Killzone 2 beats Crysis in technicalities |
No way. GDC 09, Crytek state that noone is doing what they are doing engine wise on consoles. Stating CE3 isthe only engine to run everything in realtime without tricks like KZ2 does.
|
I'm rather interested in these tricks of yours. What are they, who said it was true, how can they know?
And besides, does it really matter? What's the difference between it beeing a trick or not? It still looks better than everything else...
|
It's extremely important if a claim like KZ2 beats Crysis in technicalities is made.
And the fact that Sony or GG did not rebutle the claim at all, makes it pretrty obvious alot of tricks were used to do KZ2. We know the game already used QSAA as to not tax the system. MSAA would have had the game look better on textures but run at a snails pace.
|
So you base your claim on the fact that someone made a rumor, which is as vague as it can be "lot of tricks were used", and Sony didn't bother to comment on it? Well that's pretty shabby...
|
No. And yea. Based on Sony's past about graphics, and pitching that against Crytek. I am sorry, but would much rather put my trust in Crytek thanks. You cant change my opion so dont try. Crytek to me, are very much as trustworthy as ID for tech talk. They are the sort of dev who can spot a trick with their eyes closed.
|
I'm not trying to change your opinion, I was just trying figure out if you are serious about this incredible and super lame bullshit statement which you can't support and looks like you've made it out. Thanks for clarifying.
