Nintendo would be "embarrassed" if they were Sony or Microsoft?

[Shanobi]

Farmageddon said:

Garnett said:

Farmageddon said:

See, I've played games with over 50% more pixels than the glorified "Full HD" before PS3 or Xbox360 even launched, and some people go even higher, so you could make the exact same point about "HD". The fact is that HD is meaningless, it's not a tangible thing, it's not the top resolution, it's just the top affordable range of resolutions for TVs. How can that be a matter of innovation or mimickery?

Thats nice that you played them on PC's but were talking about CONSOLES.

 

My computer cannot connect to my TV.

 

@Viper1

Draw Distance and Enemies or objects far way. If it was on a SD console it would be blurry and pixels. 

Look, the point I'm trying to make is that it would be more expensive and less people would actually be able to use it, but the technology exists for a hypotetical console to go over-HD, wich is exactly the same comparsion between HD and SD, so there's nothing special or innovative about HD for it to be "copied". Also, so what if it's a console or a PC, it's being applied to games.

And it's hard for any computer nowadays to not be able to hook to a modern TV.

And right on. HD is NOT an innovation, it's just more power.

 

Innovation is doing something that is NOT expected. For example, I expect the next system from each company to have higher resolutions. There is nothing unexpected, or innovative, about that.