Garnett said:
L.C.E.C. said:
Garnett said:
TheGameFather said:
Garnett said:
Sempuukyaku said:
Garnett said:
Carl2291 said:
Just like Nintendo will be embarrassed when they go HD!  |
Innovation at its finest...
We did HD like what 4-5 years go?
We are doing motion controls now, Nintendo needs to move on and go HD and get with the times.
|
Yeah, Nintendo needs to "get with the times", because Wii sales are very weak.
Anyway, this is EXACTLY what I'm talking about. How does Nintendo counter statements like these? With results. Period. No need to smack talk.
|
Well if there was only one HD console out it would outsell the Wii.
|
Except PCs have been HD for since before any console ever wuz?
HD isn't an innovation, its the natural progression of things... The most obvious, thoughtless and visionless of natural progression choices at that.
|
Were not talking about PC's, i cant connect my PC to my 32 inch TV.
Were talking about Consoles that play games first and everything else.
|
Really man? I'd beg to differ considering I'm using a laptop connected via a VGA cable to my 42" TV to make this post. LOL.
|
Thats nice for you but my PC cant hook up to my TV, and all consoles can connect to all TV's..
And the term HD applies to TV's, since Monitors cant watch TV (unless you have some Computer program) the resolution terms applies to TV's.
|
You do understand that LCD TV's are essentially LCD PC monitors with tuners put in them... right? And most computers can connect to them. All HDTV's that I have ever seen have a VGA port. And so do all PC's. Soooo... It's the same thing. Also, for a long time, 360 didn't even have native HD. They had Progressive scan... Which is actually what mine is on now :o I still haven't bought an HDMI cable yet... :0
