redspear said:
strunge said:
Bamboleo said:
If Apple can sue HTC for 20 iPhone patents infringment (http://www.apple.com/pr/library/2010/03/02patents.html ) there is something that Nintendo can't do.
All this imitation can't just be created and launched just like that.
For an instance I just hate Nintendo to be so dumb about their creations and not taking the necessary measures to prevent blatant copy.
|
How about you take a few years, go to law school, and figure it out. just because two scenarios seem similar doe snot make them identical so you haven't shown a logical comparrison.
are you seriously suggesting that of all the highly skilled lawyers in the world, not to mention Nintendo's own interest in protecting their ideas, that if there was a case here you have identified it with your apparent lack of knowledge of the law and yet those skilled profesional can't figure it out.
the answer is simple -- because there is no infringement. case closed.
|
Well coming from someone whose majority of cases are IP. I can tell you that the Apple/HTC suit isn't THAT much different from nintendo suing Sony over the ARC. I say that much difference as I think Apple would have a better case but after reading the patents involved in the HTC matter Apple really seems to be reaching.
|
not having a great case doesn't prevent anyone from suing and hoping to convince a judge of their argument. take the ridiculous Lindsey Lohan suit just filed. sure, they can sue, but just because they can doesn't mean their argument is valid.
