strunge said:
How about you take a few years, go to law school, and figure it out. just because two scenarios seem similar doe snot make them identical so you haven't shown a logical comparrison. are you seriously suggesting that of all the highly skilled lawyers in the world, not to mention Nintendo's own interest in protecting their ideas, that if there was a case here you have identified it with your apparent lack of knowledge of the law and yet those skilled profesional can't figure it out. the answer is simple -- because there is no infringement. case closed. |
Well coming from someone whose majority of cases are IP. I can tell you that the Apple/HTC suit isn't THAT much different from nintendo suing Sony over the ARC. I say that much difference as I think Apple would have a better case but after reading the patents involved in the HTC matter Apple really seems to be reaching.
