By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
MikeB said:

@ Twistedpixel

I already explained before the PS3 launched why I thought the PS3 uptake would be slower initially than was the case for the PS2. (Being ahead for its time much more so than the PS2 was, this translates into higher entry pricing and problems regarding adapting legacy game engines, also relatively new and high tech such as HDTV, fast internet access and surround audio setup are preferred)

So what? Technology won't help them.

The Wii is already behind the times and yet it still kicked their butts, and a console relying on the merits of being ahead of its time will not be able to stand up to next generation consoles made for their own times. One 900M transistor GPU which is clocked higher than the RSX completely obliterates it and therefore relieves the need for anything more than a simple quad core CPU as the CPU as much of what the Cell does directly relates to tasks which the GPU, especially a DX11.5->12 GPU can do just as well or better.

However im not talking about obliteration by a 900M transistor GPU im talking about 1.5B transistor next generation GPU and not the present stock of already PS3 oblitterating technological marvels.

 



Do you know what its like to live on the far side of Uranus?