kowenicki said:
MikeB said:
kowenicki said:
MikeB said:
kowenicki said:
MikeB said:
@ kaneada
They site most of the items as the Gamespot article, but display a biased toward the PS3 version of the game. Surprisingly Gamespot, whom is known for their 360 favoritism, wrote no mention of the commonly cited version difference. I'm quite impressed they reserved judgment and decided not to advocate for one version of the game over another.
I don't understand. The PS3 version is clearly better and you are impressed they didn't write about it like they did in the past when a PS3 port was worse? |
show me where a PS3 version that isn't broken received 1.5 less...
also it should be noted that while resolution is down - framerate is better on 360 version.
1.5 is stupid and would only work if the game had gameplay issues... it doesnt have gameplay issues.
|
Where did you read the PS3 version has noticable framerate issues?
I think you sound like the kind of guy who would rave about GTA IV's cutscenes on the XBox 360 running at ~30 FPS instead of hollywood movie-like 24 FPS on the PS3. Pretty meaningless.
The game is running in 576p on the 360, surely it should be easy to keep the game locked to 30 FPS (it isn't though) on the 360.
|
go read the technical comparison that we had posted here this last week... from that you will also see that the 360 version has suffered from very poor programming more than any other factor.
|
The programming is probably OK as PS3 code is well portable. Maybe they didn't take enough advantage of the EDRam, but likely they didn't see much use to such an approach as the game assets have been degraded to suit the lower capacity DVDs (not making much of a difference running in 720p).
|
read this with an open mind. http://vgchartz.com/forum/thread.php?id=102957
|
LOL You do know that you're talking about MikeB. Asking him to read with an open mind that can affect his dear PS3 is so pointless!
