Akvod said:
My point was that contributors are supposed to be examples and models. You wouldn't write an entire paragraph to the 99% of unbiased posters in this forum. Why kowenicki? Because he's a contributor right? You can argue that shut up isn't a big deal, but my point was that seece was to be a role model, and you didn't really adress it. So clarify now please. Do you believe contributors serve as models for this forum, or are you really so afraid that kowen's next article is gonna be biased? |
If I wrote an entire paragraph to every biased person on this site, I'd be here for days. Yet still, you see me do it for dozens of people. I just did it the other day for someone who didn't hold any staff positions, and I was far more stern and aggressive about it. I type pretty fast (usually about 60-80 WPM), so I can write a paragraph like that pretty quickly and effortlessly. It's not an "entire paragraph to me." As a Contributor, Kowenicki should be generally unbiased, especially when he's writing the kind of articles he does. Now, he may not ever inject his bias into the articles he writes, but it's best to at least not show one's bias. It would be like Ebert (who in my opinion shows no bias) saying in an interview that Pixar movies are shit. He may review them without bias, but he shows his bias in other areas.
And frankly, you've been on my ass ever since that thread. Get over it. Jesus Christ.