By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
strunge said:

dsister44 said:

Strunge said:

Of course your argument depends on ignoring the simple fact that he could have said nothing at all, so perhaps the only reason he said something was because he meant it. No, that would require you to actually address the situation honestly instead of only addressing options that support your bias.  well done, that is if you are only trying to make dishonest and unintelligent statements.

*sigh* 

This would have been newsworthy had it been any other developer then one owned by Sony. Did people really expect anything different from them? And how am I being dishonest?

you're either being dishonest or unintelligent, you decide which you are being.  intelligent arguments require logic.  what you did was a logical fallacy called an ad hominen attack, which is when you can't dispute a position (his review) so you in turn attack the person to discredit them.  so, since an intelligent argument requires logic, and your position lacked logic due to the nature of the ad hominen, it is up to you if you want to say you weren't being dishonest, which would mean you intentionally took a flawed position, or you didn't know better and couldn't identify your illogical position, which makes your post reveal a lack of intelligence.  it's up to you.  but this is the logical ramifications when you troll -- it reveals something significant about you.  

I was not trolling. I pointed out something obvious. It is a Sony developer that told us a Sony exclusive was worth the purchase of a console. Really what do you expect him to say? His words would have had carried a lot more meaning had they been from any other developer(meaning one not owned by Sony).