Barozi said:
If I had the choice I'd rather play against Italy than against England, Netherlands, Spain or Brazil, but it's not possible to avoid good teams in the world cup. And let's not forget, that you don't need to play the best football to win the title |
I don't know. I'd pick Italy over Brazil, and maybe over Spain, but definitely not over England. England, while a team with great players and in a good form, it's not a team that instills you fear of knowing you'll face them, it's not a team that has something we here call "cup spirit", which is the chance that have some teams of beating you in a game just with their history and a bit of luck, even if they're playing horribly. Brazil has it in spades, Italy and Germany have it too, you as German know it very well when you beat us in 2006 even though we played better that game, and then you suffered it against Italy in the semis. England may very well have great matches, but I still think they'll falter in the road. It's the only reason while I'm not fully convinced of Spain, while the football they're playing is above any other nation, that they lack that kind of spirit, luck, whatever has made me not consider it a sure fire for the cup.
Then again, the WC has proved time and again that the biggest candidate never wins the cup. France and Argentina were top candidates in 2002, both huge failures, Brazil had entered almost as bad as we did this WC and won. In 2006, Brazil was the only candidate to be considered, and their failure was massive, while France and Italy that weren't considered as top candidates reached the final. It may very well be the case here again
As for the last sentence, I fully agree. Look who won the WC in 1954 








