And tell me, what facts have you presented? A handful of developers, most of which people could care less about supporting a console which is suppossed to be in its prime.
The facts I present are all anyone needs, lots of hardware sold and virtually no software sold. Oh my, so successful indeed. The PSP is the ideal of handheld gaming clearly, every console should idealy be justified by just a handful of must have games in the fullness of a console's lifetime.
Why do you so adamantly defend what is clearly a sinking ship and a testament to a powerful brand name that once was but no longer is. You're just kidding yourself Nazna. Are a handful of must have games really worth defending a failed venture? Do you actually think the PSP2 will be able to get any more games than what the PSP did given its abismal software sales?
If you want to see how many people are buying PSPs for those games and developers you claim are so wonderful, just look at Software sales vs Hardware. That should be fact enough for you.
You try and justify the PSP by the semantics of what can be called a Success with out providing a single link to show its actually being sold at a profit but then try to spin me as the rhetorictitian for pointing out the clear and obvious fact that this thing is selling virtually no games and has only a fraction of the developers of your average console.
Face it Nazna, you can only defend the PSP for so long. Now that I think about it, there are still people who insist the N-Gage was a great console.
Existing User Log In
New User Registration
Register for a free account to gain full access to the VGChartz Network and join our thriving community.
