By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
Domicinator said:
Some of you guys misinterpreted something here:

I meant in the GRAPHICS department that BFBC2 was the worst game of the three. I don't think the engine looks much better than BFBC1. There are a lot of jaggies, the vegetation looks grainy, it's just not very good. In MAG the graphics are more plain jane, but at least they're clean and crisp. And graphics are the least of my problems really--if the game is fun, I don't care if it's not a graphics power house.

I'm just saying that I don't think BFBC2 is going to topple MW2 as EA is claiming. If anything, it's COPYING MW2. It's definitely catering more to that kind of player, which is why I think I'm probably going to skip BC2 and get Battlefield 3 for PC.

No, it's not copying MW2 when it comes to what matters, the game-play mechanics. It only copies Modern Warfare's marketing to the broad masses. So you're right about that part, it's catering to that kind of player and many MW2 players will buy BC2. And that's a good thing because these players will move to a lot more advanced and sophisticated game in my opinion (with BC2's objective based team play). We need those games too, with a big player base to support them.